Bell v. State
Bell v. State
776 S.W.2d 453; 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1257; 1989 WL 102158
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Bell v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, Winston Bell, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Motion court dismissed movant’s motion as untimely. Rule 24.035(Z). The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(j). Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696[2] (Mo.banc 1989). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.