Missouri Court of Appeals, 1989

Hardy v. State

Hardy v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 12, 1989
778 S.W.2d 836; 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295; 1989 WL 105671 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Hardy v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Movant appeals from that part of a judgment, entered after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 27.26 motion claim that his plea was involuntary because counsel was ineffective. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.