Hardy v. State
Hardy v. State
778 S.W.2d 836; 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295; 1989 WL 105671
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Hardy v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals from that part of a judgment, entered after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 27.26 motion claim that his plea was involuntary because counsel was ineffective. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.