Schmidt v. State
Schmidt v. State
782 S.W.2d 770; 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1724; 1989 WL 146995
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Schmidt v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.