Missouri Court of Appeals, 1989

Brown v. State

Brown v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 5, 1989
783 S.W.2d 428; 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1726; 1989 WL 146999 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Brown v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Glen Brown, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court dismissed movant’s motion as untimely because it was not filed before June 30, 1988. Rule 29.15(m). The time limits as to when a Rule 29.15 motion must be filed are constitutional. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696[3] (Mo.banc 1989). The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(j). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.