Missouri Court of Appeals, 1989

Bonstell v. State

Bonstell v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 12, 1989
784 S.W.2d 239; 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1792; 1989 WL 150280 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Bonstell v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum *240for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.