Smith v. State
Smith v. State
784 S.W.2d 910; 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 304; 1990 WL 17804
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
Movant appeals the denial after an evi-dentiary hearing of his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Rule 29.15. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.