Missouri Court of Appeals, 1990

Prince v. State

Prince v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 6, 1990
787 S.W.2d 786; 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 361; 1990 WL 21192 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Prince v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial after an evi-dentiary hearing of his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Rule 27.26 (now repealed). We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.