Missouri Court of Appeals, 1990

Houston v. State

Houston v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 20, 1990
787 S.W.2d 823; 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 431; 1990 WL 29840 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Houston v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 27.26 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.