Missouri Court of Appeals, 1990

Hicks v. State

Hicks v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 20, 1990
789 S.W.2d 85; 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 430; 1990 WL 29811 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Hicks v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 (now repealed) motion to vacate sentence after an evidentiary hearing. We *86affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.