Gaskin v. State
Gaskin v. State
789 S.W.2d 895; 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 872; 1990 WL 74525
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Gaskin v. State
Opinion of the Court
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.