Missouri Court of Appeals, 1990

State v. Stegall

State v. Stegall
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 17, 1990
792 S.W.2d 692; 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1612; 1990 WL 99339 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Stegall

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant filed notice of direct appeal, but has raised no points in that appeal; there*693fore, he has abandoned it. He also appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.