Jenkins v. State
Jenkins v. State
800 S.W.2d 802; 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1825; 1990 WL 205242
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Jenkins v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion challenging his conviction due to ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons- for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.