Kent v. State
Kent v. State
801 S.W.2d 483; 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1765; 1990 WL 198192
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Kent v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Mov-ant’s claims of error fail because the record conclusively refutes them. Movant is not entitled to relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are supported by the record, hence, not clearly erroneous. Judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.