Hemphill Contracting Co. v. Board of Adjustment
Hemphill Contracting Co. v. Board of Adjustment
810 S.W.2d 517; 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 264; 1991 WL 22327
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Hemphill Contracting Co. v. Board of Adjustment
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s order which found plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence to establish nonconforming use.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.