Foster v. State
Foster v. State
815 S.W.2d 2; 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1035; 1989 WL 251373
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Foster v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, Robert H. Foster, appeals from the denial of his motion pursuant to Rule 74.06, which was styled as a writ of coram nobis. We have reviewed appellant’s claim of error, the record on which it is based and the findings and conclusions of the motion court and find no error. We also have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value and affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties, has been prepared which sets forth the basis of our decision.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.