Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992

Times v. State

Times v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 5, 1992
831 S.W.2d 712; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 759; 1992 WL 88279 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Times v. State

Opinion of the Court

*713ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.