Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992

Rinderer v. Maplewood Eye Care Group

Rinderer v. Maplewood Eye Care Group
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 11, 1992
837 S.W.2d 24; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1463; 1992 WL 188801 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Rinderer v. Maplewood Eye Care Group

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from an award to claimant by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.