Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992

Nobles v. State

Nobles v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 22, 1992
837 S.W.2d 46; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1504; 1992 WL 230220 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Nobles v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals following dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the rea*47sons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑