Larkins v. State
Larkins v. State
838 S.W.2d 15; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1234; 1992 WL 166106
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Larkins v. State
Opinion of the Court
Movant appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion after pleading guilty to distribution of a controlled substance near a school. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.