Jordan v. State
Jordan v. State
841 S.W.2d 690; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1399; 1992 WL 202896
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Jordan v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.