Young v. State
Young v. State
841 S.W.2d 776; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1719; 1992 WL 332591
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Young v. State
Opinion of the Court
Movant, Donald Lee Young, appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record as submitted, and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.