Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993

Hill v. State

Hill v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 30, 1993 · Ahrens, Crist, Reinhard
849 S.W.2d 738; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 456; 1993 WL 88092 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Hill v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after a Luleff hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons *739for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑