Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993

Mattingly v. Costello

Mattingly v. Costello
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 13, 1993 · Gaertner, Smith, Stephan
850 S.W.2d 125; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 538; 1993 WL 106368 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Mattingly v. Costello

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in her favor of $1,000 for injuries allegedly sustained in an automobile accident. She premises error on questions to witnesses and to arguments of counsel. Objection was made to only one of the questions— defendant’s occupation. Such a question is proper. Wilcox v. Coons, 362 Mo. 381, 241 S.W.2d 907 (Mo. 1951) [17-19]. No objections were made to any of the other questions or to the arguments. Nothing has been preserved for review. There is no precedential value to an extended opinion. Judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.