Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of § 195.202, RSMo Cum.Supp.1992. In addition to his direct appeal, he also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).