Hicks v. State
Hicks v. State
851 S.W.2d 689; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 390; 1993 WL 73913
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Hicks v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant pled guilty to one count of burglary in the second degree and one count of attempted stealing over $150. He was sentenced as a Class X offender. He appeals the denial of his 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing and from his sentence. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b) and Rule 30.-25(b). No error of law appears; the motion court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.