Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993

Cull v. St. Charles Golf Course, Inc.

Cull v. St. Charles Golf Course, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 8, 1993 · Gaertner, Smith, Stephan
854 S.W.2d 835; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 837; 1993 WL 189569 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cull v. St. Charles Golf Course, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a jury verdict against him in this slip and fall personal injury case. Plaintiff fell while walking with his golf shoes on across a concrete floor. The floor had recently been treated with sealer and the evidence was conflicting as to whether this made the floor more, less, or equally slick to its previous condition. There were caution signs posted warning that cleats slip on concrete. The jury returned a verdict finding defendant 0% at fault and plaintiff 100% at fault.

The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. We find no error in the trial court rulings or instructions upon which review is sought. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. Judgment is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.