Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993

Cantrell v. State

Cantrell v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 17, 1993 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
858 S.W.2d 874; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1282; 1993 WL 308947 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cantrell v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the dismissal, for untimely filing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.