Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993

Hicks v. State

Hicks v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 31, 1993 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
860 S.W.2d 392; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1363; 1993 WL 327138 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Hicks v. State

Opinion of the Court

*393ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, John Hicks, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for stealing a motor vehicle for which movant was sentenced on his plea of guilty to imprisonment for three years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.