Huggins v. State
Huggins v. State
860 S.W.2d 393; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1370; 1993 WL 327140
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Huggins v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, Sylvester Huggins, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, after an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of three counts of assault in the first degree and sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 30 years, 20 years, and 20 years.
We have reviewed the record with regard to the motion court’s denial of movant’s Rule 29.15 motion. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.