Lanasa v. State
Lanasa v. State
860 S.W.2d 398; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1411; 1993 WL 335387
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Lanasa v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.