Spicuzza v. State
Spicuzza v. State
862 S.W.2d 390; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1417; 1993 WL 344333
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Spicuzza v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.