Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993

State v. Brown

State v. Brown
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 21, 1993 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
862 S.W.2d 926 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Brown

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo 1986, and kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find defendant’s claims of error are without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.-16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.