State v. Curtis
State v. Curtis
863 S.W.2d 6; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1506; 1993 WL 375989
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Curtis
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Defendant appeals his convictions for second degree burglary and stealing. We find the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to support Defendant’s convictions. We further find the trial court’s denial of Defendant’s suppression motion was not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. A written opinion has been furnished the parties, for their information only.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.