Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993

Riefle v. State

Riefle v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 14, 1993 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
863 S.W.2d 383; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1416; 1993 WL 344332 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Riefle v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been fur'nished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.