Riefle v. State
Riefle v. State
863 S.W.2d 383; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1416; 1993 WL 344332
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Riefle v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been fur'nished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.