In this jury-tried case, plaintiff-customer was awarded damages for injuries she received when she fell on some ice on defendant-owner’s property. Owner appeals.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).