Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993

Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. Puller

Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. Puller
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 9, 1993 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
864 S.W.2d 433; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1729; 1993 WL 453617 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. Puller

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Schnucks appeals the trial court’s ruling denying its claim for unjust enrichment against Puller for $7,632. We affirm.

We find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by "written order. A memorandum for the parties’ use only has been prepared.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑