Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993

McDonald v. State

McDonald v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 23, 1993 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
865 S.W.2d 446; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1800 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

McDonald v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced in accordance with the jury’s punishment verdict to a ten year prison term. He also appeals the dismissal, for untimely filing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential *447value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.