Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993

State v. Gordon

State v. Gordon
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 7, 1993 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
865 S.W.2d 896; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1884 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Gordon

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1992. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent, class X, minimum term offender and a prior and persistent drug offender. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.