Harrold v. State
Harrold v. State
867 S.W.2d 673; 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1979; 1993 WL 524279
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Harrold v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
An opinion in this case would serve no precedential purpose. Therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.