Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Hoskins v. State

Hoskins v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 11, 1994 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
867 S.W.2d 720; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 26; 1994 WL 4279 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Hoskins v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion for postcon-viction relief as successive and untimely. Rule 29.15(k) and (m). We further find an opinion in this case would have no prece-dential purpose and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.