Houghton v. State
Houghton v. State
869 S.W.2d 856; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 162; 1994 WL 23759
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Houghton v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, Donald Houghton, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.