Camden v. State
Camden v. State
869 S.W.2d 861; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 156; 1994 WL 23888
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Camden v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, Wilson Camden, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for possession of a controlled substance for which movant was sentenced to imprisonment for eight years.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.