Camden v. State
Camden v. State
869 S.W.2d 861; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 156; 1994 WL 23888
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, Wilson Camden, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for possession of a controlled substance for which movant was sentenced to imprisonment for eight years.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.