Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Walker v. State

Walker v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 8, 1994 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
869 S.W.2d 921; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 186; 1994 WL 35534 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Walker v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons *922for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑