Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Arnold v. City of Florissant

Arnold v. City of Florissant
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 8, 1994 · Ahrens, Gaertner, Grimm
871 S.W.2d 145; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 377; 1994 WL 67141 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Arnold v. City of Florissant

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a police officer of the City of Florissant, appeals the judgment of the circuit court affirming the disciplinary action imposed against him by the Florissant Personnel Commission. The Commission’s decision was supported by competent and substantial evidence, was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, and is not in violation of constitutional provisions or in excess of statutory authority. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information setting forth the facts and reasons for which the trial court’s judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.