Radford v. State
Radford v. State
872 S.W.2d 140; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 439; 1994 WL 75830
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Radford v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.