Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

State v. Washington

State v. Washington
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 19, 1994 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
873 S.W.2d 681; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 653; 1994 WL 133064 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Washington

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of sodomy and the motion court denied his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. We find no error of law appears and the findings of fact of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). Further, we find no precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended *682opinion and affirm by written order. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑