Surgeon v. State
Surgeon v. State
873 S.W.2d 682; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 656; 1994 WL 133097
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Surgeon v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. We find no error of law. Rule 84.16(b)(5). Further, we find the findings of fact issued by the motion court in denying Defendant’s motion are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
An opinion in this case would have no precedential value. Therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.