Fanning v. Andres
Fanning v. Andres
874 S.W.2d 506; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 398; 1994 WL 67139
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Fanning v. Andres
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs’ filed a pleading which they labeled “Petition for Damages for Tortious Interference with Contracts.” The trial court sustained defendants’ motions to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action and dismissed the petition with prejudice.
No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.-16(b).
The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.