Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Thomas v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 5, 1994 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard

878 S.W.2d 528; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1105; 1994 WL 313621 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Taylor (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Earl Thomas, appeals from the dismissal of his motion for postconviction relief. Movant has previously filed a motion under Rule 29.15, which was denied after an evidentiary hearing. Following a consolidated appeal, this court denied his claims .and affirmed the judgments. State v. Thomas, 830 S.W.2d 546 (Mo.App.E.D. 1992). Although movant now purports to seek relief under Rule 74.06, in fact his motion is a successive Rule 29.15 motion.

Rule 29.15(k) prohibits, successive Rule 29.15 motions. The trial court properly dismissed the motion.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.