Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994

Robertson v. A.I.G. Agency

Robertson v. A.I.G. Agency
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 12, 1994 · Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
878 S.W.2d 928; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1149; 1994 WL 328342 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Robertson v. A.I.G. Agency

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals from the trial court’s decree granting employer, A.I.G. Agency, *929Inc., an injunction based upon a noncompetition clause contained in a contract between employee and employer. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.